Isabelle Mercier - World Poker Tour Ladies Night

The Ladies Invitational tournament held at The Bicycle Casino was a little different this year. The World Poker Tour invited five women: Clonie Gowen (returning champion of Ladies Night 1), Isabelle Mercier, Wendeen Eolis, Sharon Goldman and Cyndy Violette. The last seat went to the one woman who could win her way via a No Limit Holdem tournament held prior to the Invitational. This year, the winner was Lavinna Zhang who beat out over 300 women including myself for her seat.

This episode was not one of the best of the WPT shows. I was looking forward to seeing Cyndy kick some butt, but she never really got anything going. I wanted to Clonie on the show for a little while because she makes for interesting television, but she was the first person eliminated. I wanted to see the other women just play great poker, but I was not impressed by a lot of it.

Isabelle seemed so serious throughout the tournament. It almost looked as if she was giving the other women dirty looks. Every once in awhile, she would crack a smile and you could catch a glimpse of some of her charm. I am not suggesting that she smile throughout the tournament. Sometimes the competitive nature of the game can make us look like serious creatures, but it so much more appealing to the audience to see some of the lighter side of personalities. I wish she would have shown more of that.

In fairness to her, I have to say that she played great poker. She was the aggressor throughout the tournament and that led to her victory. She had the ability to calculate pot odds and make correct calls. She was able to get away from a couple of hands. She maximized the chips she won on a couple of hands where she might not have got even one bet if she played it another way. The fact that she got a lot more playable hands than the other women didn't hurt either.

I decided to do the reports a little different this year. After doing so many of them and then talking to some of the players after, I realized that it is almost impossible to evaluate some of the hands. Players make decisions based on all the hands played previously with their opponents. The episodes that air for television have been edited, so it is impossible to figure out many of the reasons why a player played a hand a particular way. Although, I am not going to discuss many of the hands, I will discuss when I think a player made a good play or bad play based on the foundations of poker. This leads me to the following hand.

Lavinna Zhang

Isabelle, Lavinna, and Sharon were the final three women at the table. Lavinna folded on the button and Sharon raised the $60,000 big blind to $200,000 with Q6. Isabelle thought for awhile and finally moved all-in with A5. Sharon only had $200,000 left and was getting three to one on her call. I remember thinking that it was going to be a difficult call to make, but she had to do it. She was getting the right price against anything except the best three hands, and she was in a desperate position in any case. She folded the hand and was eliminated on the next hand we saw when she took her A5 against Isabelle's AQ. I do not think there is anything wrong with her raise in that spot, but I see two things wrong with the way the hand was played. She should have called because of the pot odds and her small stack, and her second mistake was if she was going to commit half her stack on that hand, she should have moved all-in. She would have made the decision more difficult for Isabelle. Sharon also would then not have the opportunity to make a bad decision by folding.

I wanted to win my way onto this event, but if anybody deserved it, Lavinna certainly did. That girl can play! I was impressed with every move she made. She was not afraid to back down. She made remarkable moves in certain situations. She called every pot when she was getting the right pot odds. There was one hand that she called where many players wouldn't. She raised with 95 suited and Sharon moved all-in. Lavinna asked the dealer to pull the original bets in so she could see how much she needed to call. Many players would not make the call in this situation even if they were getting the correct odds because they would be embarrassed to show their hand and their bluff. Not Lavinna. She called. I am not sure if she has any interest in becoming a professional player, but if she makes that move, she will be a force to be reckoned with.

The final results of the tournament showed that the aggressive players are often victorious. Isabelle Mercier and Lavinna Zhang were the most aggressive players at the table and they finished first and second respectively. Sharon Goldman finished in third, Wendeen Eolis fourth, Cyndy Violette fifth, and Cycalona "Clonie" Gowen was sixth place.

Ladies Invitational Three

Poker Main Page
Poker Games My Journal	Ladies Night Invitational 2 World Poker Tour Report by Shirley Rosario
Poker Players Poker Tips How to Play Poker Basics Poker Hands Poker Terms Poker Tells Free Poker Games Online Texas Holdem Rules Texas Hold'em Games Omaha Poker Scooping Poker Tournaments World Poker Tour WSOP Poker Stats PokerTracker Sharkscope Calculatem ThePokerDb Official Poker Rankings Site Map	The Ladies Invitational tournament held at The Bicycle Casino was a little different this year. The World Poker Tour invited five women: Clonie Gowen (returning champion of Ladies Night 1), Isabelle Mercier, Wendeen Eolis, Sharon Goldman and Cyndy Violette. The last seat went to the one woman who could win her way via a No Limit Holdem tournament held prior to the Invitational. This year, the winner was Lavinna Zhang who beat out over 300 women including myself for her seat. This episode was not one of the best of the WPT shows. I was looking forward to seeing Cyndy kick some butt, but she never really got anything going. I wanted to Clonie on the show for a little while because she makes for interesting television, but she was the first person eliminated. I wanted to see the other women just play great poker, but I was not impressed by a lot of it. Isabelle seemed so serious throughout the tournament. It almost looked as if she was giving the other women dirty looks. Every once in awhile, she would crack a smile and you could catch a glimpse of some of her charm. I am not suggesting that she smile throughout the tournament. Sometimes the competitive nature of the game can make us look like serious creatures, but it so much more appealing to the audience to see some of the lighter side of personalities. I wish she would have shown more of that. In fairness to her, I have to say that she played great poker. She was the aggressor throughout the tournament and that led to her victory. She had the ability to calculate pot odds and make correct calls. She was able to get away from a couple of hands. She maximized the chips she won on a couple of hands where she might not have got even one bet if she played it another way. The fact that she got a lot more playable hands than the other women didn't hurt either. Windows - Mac I decided to do the reports a little different this year. After doing so many of them and then talking to some of the players after, I realized that it is almost impossible to evaluate some of the hands. Players make decisions based on all the hands played previously with their opponents. The episodes that air for television have been edited, so it is impossible to figure out many of the reasons why a player played a hand a particular way. Although, I am not going to discuss many of the hands, I will discuss when I think a player made a good play or bad play based on the foundations of poker. This leads me to the following hand. Isabelle, Lavinna, and Sharon were the final three women at the table. Lavinna folded on the button and Sharon raised the $60,000 big blind to $200,000 with Q6. Isabelle thought for awhile and finally moved all-in with A5. Sharon only had $200,000 left and was getting three to one on her call. I remember thinking that it was going to be a difficult call to make, but she had to do it. She was getting the right price against anything except the best three hands, and she was in a desperate position in any case. She folded the hand and was eliminated on the next hand we saw when she took her A5 against Isabelle's AQ. I do not think there is anything wrong with her raise in that spot, but I see two things wrong with the way the hand was played. She should have called because of the pot odds and her small stack, and her second mistake was if she was going to commit half her stack on that hand, she should have moved all-in. She would have made the decision more difficult for Isabelle. Sharon also would then not have the opportunity to make a bad decision by folding. I wanted to win my way onto this event, but if anybody deserved it, Lavinna certainly did. That girl can play! I was impressed with every move she made. She was not afraid to back down. She made remarkable moves in certain situations. She called every pot when she was getting the right pot odds. There was one hand that she called where many players wouldn't. She raised with 95 suited and Sharon moved all-in. Lavinna asked the dealer to pull the original bets in so she could see how much she needed to call. Many players would not make the call in this situation even if they were getting the correct odds because they would be embarrassed to show their hand and their bluff. Not Lavinna. She called. I am not sure if she has any interest in becoming a professional player, but if she makes that move, she will be a force to be reckoned with. The final results of the tournament showed that the aggressive players are often victorious. Isabelle Mercier and Lavinna Zhang were the most aggressive players at the table and they finished first and second respectively. Sharon Goldman finished in third, Wendeen Eolis fourth, Cyndy Violette fifth, and Cycalona "Clonie" Gowen was sixth place. Ladies Invitational Three
Play Online Poker Texas Hold'em Tournament Poker How to Play Poker Poker Bonus

Ladies Night Invitational 2

World Poker Tour Report